humannature

October 31, 2009

Homemade Halloween Costume Help!!!?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — francisbyrd1978 @ 5:29 pm

I need some good, not little kiddish but not too old, homemade halloween costume ideas for under $10 but i dont want it to be lame and i kinda want to look pretty! Please help A.S.A.P!! I have to make it! Im not good at sewing, and i want somethng easy!! Thanks!


Halloween is one of the best times of the year so try something like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HA4kGoTc ts

Love,
B.
B.Lieve | Oct 28, 2009

What movies have you seen and vowed to yourself to never watch or think about again?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — francisbyrd1978 @ 10:05 am

For me, it would be:
Disney’s Black Hole (1979)
Last Action Hero (1993)
Junior (1994)
The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997)
The Cell (2000)
Titan AE (2000)
The Grinch (2000)
Tim Burton’s Planet of the Apes (2001)
Cat in the Hat (2003)
M. Night Shyamalan’s the Village (2004)
Hostage (2005)
1408 (2007)
Bug (2007)
Meet the Spartans (2008)


Whale Rider
epic_times_nine | Oct 26, 2009


Phone Booth
Open Water

Two of the dumbest movies I’ve ever seen…
Penguin Gal | Oct 26, 2009


mystic river
purplefanlady | Oct 26, 2009


Mine would be the Rocky Horror Picture Show. (1975)

*Shivers down spine.*
Gold Fish Alert | Oct 26, 2009


Into the Wild

Beloved

Cloverfield

Spiderman 3
Rainbow Vahmet | Oct 26, 2009


30 Days of Night.
The Village
The Cube
Pkfersure | Oct 26, 2009


Napoleon Dynamite
Stepmom
The Descent
Johnson Family Vacation
Are We There Yet?
Are We Done Yet?
Roll Bounce
The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift
Jarvis | Oct 26, 2009


Probably… (don’t hate me for this!)
Step Brothers

… I mean, for a comedy, it’s not very funny.

And what’s wrong with The Grinch?? lol
RosesHaveThorns | Oct 26, 2009


The Lady in the Water
The Happening
30 Days of Night
Zack and Miri Make a Porno
Alien v. Predator Requiem
Stepbrothers
Harold and Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay
Kung Pow

Marley and Me (too sad!)

There’s more I just can’t think of them right now :) Just Mel | Oct 26, 2009


of the top of my head:
Lady in the water
Shutter
the new Halloween 2 (i mean wtf!! seriously)
Hope S | Oct 26, 2009


Super Mario Brothers (1993)
Cabin Boy (1994)
Planet Of The Apes (2001)
josh_lech | Oct 27, 2009


son of the mask
sanket r | Oct 28, 2009

October 29, 2009

How many NBA teams would the Spanish National Team beat in a 7 game series?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — francisbyrd1978 @ 9:02 am

They gave the redeem team a fight over the summer…could they win a championship if they were to play in the NBA system?


I think the Spanish National Team would lose to the following teams: (Three)

1) New Orleans Hornets - Calderon is good but Paul is way better. While West and Gasol would be a great match-up. I think Spanish team will have a tough time if Peja will knock down his shots. Prediction 4-3 Hornets

2) Houston Rockets - T-Mac, Yao and Artest are too much even for the Gasol brothers. They are really improved this year. Prediction 4-2 Rockets.

3) Boston Celtics - The Big 3 are a hard cover for the Spanish team especially when the Celtics reserves has shown that they can produce and contribute to the team.

* I did not include the Lakers because Pau Gasol is playing for the Spanish team also.
* Easily a win for the Spanish team: Memphis, Oklahoma City, Minnesota, L.A. Clippers
* The rest of league they have a chance to beat them

ryx12 | Nov 19, 2008


Everyone except the Celtics and Lakers.
imnotanexpert | Nov 15, 2008


the clippers and bucks and 76ers
ajay a | Nov 15, 2008


In the Eastern Conference they’d probably be a 3 or 4 seed, and out west they’d be a 7 or 8.
Wayward Mind | Nov 15, 2008


No way,
nba is way harder than spanish league they will probably beat clippers
Romario(Lakers 7-1) | Nov 15, 2008


theyd beat the clips, the nicks, and the wizards.
big "E" | Nov 15, 2008


Nope because their best players play for NBA teams. Can’t have it both ways.
Jason G | Nov 15, 2008


they would do great think about it

the lakers wouldnt have pau. so they would suffer

portland would lose rudy
memphis would lose marc

they could probably do great.. they almost beat the best players from this league.

why would they not be able to beat some average teams.
lakers 4 life(7-1) | Nov 15, 2008


i think none because the USA team barely beat them with all the good players in the NBA, so i think no NBA can beat the min a 7 game series. i think Celtics or Lakers might be able to lose 4-2. Remember that they have the Gasol Bros, Rudy Fernandez, and that 17-year old guy who plays like Magic Johnson.
Jay B | Nov 16, 2008

What happened to Whale Wars on History Channel?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — francisbyrd1978 @ 5:18 am

I was just watching the Whales Wars on The History Channel And i looked the next day on TV & online at History channel and nothing not a trace of it, Normally it tell you the information on the show but nothing. I even typed it in search and nothing.Anyone have any ideaof whats going on. I no even when the season is over they still have it on the web site and on demand to watch. This all happened in a matter of a day. Anyone have any clue?


Whale wars on the animal planet, you can watch new episodes fridays at 8/9.

ROckStaR bY dAy VAmPiRe By NiGHt | Jul 06, 2009


"Whale Wars" is on Animal Planet.
bighopes35 | Jul 05, 2009

October 28, 2009

How do you feel knowing that Mc Cain voted against raising the minimum wage 19 times?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — francisbyrd1978 @ 3:50 pm

It’s no wonder people, couldn’t meet their obligations, and lost homes etc. I was over whelmed at the thought that a man who owns 7 homes would deny the working poor a small hike in minimum wages. 19 times?
It’s a pretty dumb thing when we see everything going up, but a workers pay check, and some of you feel thats a good discission made to keep honest working people earnings far below the cost of living, Even pay increases are put on non working Families welfare checksevery year, and if they have another child, more is added.WAKE-UP and Wise up AMERICA.
Wowie! Go back to school, and learn about the Slaves who helped build this country with their Blood, Sweat and tears, they worked before the sun came up until long after the sun went down. what was their pay? your little work in agriculture is nothing to compare to those great people who had no education, no love. no respect. no Family. especially if you are an immigrant of the 70’s up to now, you’ve done nothing here in this country to brag about. This Country was already built before you were born, that’s why you came here to enjoy the many benefits of our country! you should be ashamed to try to make me or any people think yourself to be any better than the Black Slaves who built this country free! America was built on the backs of Black Slaves young and old, even babies was separated from their mothers and sold. their pay was a whip and rope,often their bodies covered with tar and feathers and burned alive to the stake, for any, or no reason at all, that was their appreciation
By the way, all of you who thinks a mini wage hike would be bad for the ecconomy. Well,.. there had been no increase given in the minimum for almost 2 decades, So what is your excuse for all of the inflation, we have been faced within the last 20 some years.
By the way, all of you who thinks a mini wage hike would be bad for the ecconomy. Well,.. there had been no increase given in the minimum for almost 2 decades, So what is your excuse for all of the inflation, we have been faced with within the last 20 some years? In other words, all of these woes ,some of you said will happen if there is an increase in minimum wages, but all of terribleThese things have occured any way, while there was no wage increase given by our Gov, Why?


Selfish, old, rich, white guy connected to the corporate lobbyists like nobody else. Why would you expect him to care about people?

A.R. | Sep 07, 2008


GOOD.

He is not for that communist minimum wage. Once he becomes President he will PASS Bush/McCain Amnesty for Illegal Aliens which will legalize 20 million illegals! This will be a great new labor pool that will work for LESS and not have the OUTRAGEOUS health insurance and other benefit demand of the liberal middle and working classes. They will work cheaper for NO BENEFITS!!!

Aren’t you SICK of the liberal middle and working classes bashing our President Bush and our John McCain/Sarah Palin!?!

Let the market set the wages, no more of that democrat socialism and communism! Let the liberal middle and working classes EAT CAKE.

Voted BUSH TWICE. Will vote McCain/Palin TWICE to destroy the liberal middle class once and for all!
subwm4bush | Sep 07, 2008


Like he’s an elitist hypocrite.

Check out this horrifying article about Sarah Palin.

http://www.laprogressive.com/2008/09/05/ alaskans-speak-in-a-frightened-whisper-p alin-is-%E2%80%9Cracist-sexist-vindictiv e-and-mean%E2%80%9D/
Sophie P | Sep 07, 2008


Raising the minimum wage is actually a bad idea. Although you may think i am crazy, economics proves it actually can have worse affects on the economy.

read this….
Macy | Sep 07, 2008


Terrible!!! But I knew already, that’s why I’m voting for Obama/Biden. McCain also voted against more funding for Vets, can you believe that?
PRLadyDama | Sep 07, 2008


His record of voting AGAINST veterans….and not even bothering to show up to vote on most veterans bills… is more damaging and disgusting.
tickled blue | Sep 07, 2008


He’s a republican, it doesnt surprise me. GOP’s want to rich to get richer and the poor to get poorer, a very dysfunctional way of thinking.
Tina | Sep 07, 2008


I FEEL FANTASTIC!

great decision by McCain
Liberal Youth Breed Hate | Sep 07, 2008


I think the free market should dictate wages and prices.

People fail to realize that a lot of our woes are from the government trying to overregulate the free market.

This is an old democrat class warfare trick.
Mr Krinkle | Sep 07, 2008


I think it’s irresponsible. Especially with the prices of everything going up.
Centauri | Sep 07, 2008


You do understand that under basic economics if you raise the minimum wage the domino effect says it raises the cost of everything back up over the minimum wage and you end up WORSE off?
Right?

McCain08 | Sep 07, 2008


well what do you expect from the party of the millionares and billionares

how else are they going to earn those 7 homes, by working for it? They need the lower and working class to work and suffer as much as possible so they can get more money for themselves
k | Sep 07, 2008


Awesome!

It means that employers will go out an hire people again because min wage eliminates jobs. Look what happens when gas goes to high. People stop buying so when wages become to much businesses cut jobs.
thetimbosley | Sep 07, 2008


People did not lose their homes because of minimum wage. People lost their homes because the Big Companies gave them Adjustable Mortgage Rates, and when those adjusted mortgages adjusted ten years later - payments couldn’t be made. Stupidity on the part of the lenders and the buyers.

Also, higher minimum wage = job losses and higher costs of production and shipping, which means the cost of everything goes up, up, up! and job losses increase.

Read your Economics homework before making a stupid statement like you did.

My bank didn’t even offer an Adjustable loan to us - we got only Fixed rates. We still have our house and our cars. Want the government to give you more?

Try working.

Go back to your "Beauty and style" section sweetheart.
Wowie | Sep 07, 2008


he did that because raising the minimum wage doesnt work. you raise the minimum wage, companies just raise their prices, or worse downsize.

don’t believe me? check the before and after results of the minimum wage being raised.
Ask Andy | Sep 07, 2008


you ever tried running a business? didn’t think so.
Col Kilgore | Sep 07, 2008


when you raise minimum wage a lot of the "minimum" people get fired…..
tabbi8407 | Sep 07, 2008


Good. It is a certain cause for inflation across the whole economy. Clue. People on minimum wage do not own houses.
wiemercats | Sep 07, 2008


You realize that raising minimum wage does nothing overall right? People that make more than minimum wage don’t get a raise when minimum wage goes up (I know this from experience). It devalues working hard if minimum wage goes up every few years.
Liberal Kool-Aid | Sep 07, 2008


About the same way that I feel about him repeatedly voting against military and Veterans’ benefits - and then trying to hide the fact.

Not too happy about that…
Don P - Keeping 'em Honest | Sep 07, 2008


It is typical of him and his party.
Rotten to the core.
aurorah | Sep 07, 2008


Like it’s a non-issue, since most states have a minimum wage above the national one anyway.
God's Reporter | Sep 07, 2008


States should set their own minimum wages. Ours is always higher than the federal government’s, but I understand why they have to keep it lower in the federal government–different states have different economies. State officials should respond to the will of their constituents based on the region’s needs, not what the Federal government dictates.
luv2bfit | Sep 07, 2008


That’s a good thing if you believe in push and pull inflation like I do. If the business has to pay its workers more, then it will charge more for the products it sells. So even if they get raises they will now have to pay more for goods. Then they cry they aren’t making enough money so again a new amount is given and the prices go even higher.
gregory_dittman | Sep 07, 2008


Prove it! And did you know that Obama is a Muslim,and that has already been proven in his Book!
greyeagle | Sep 07, 2008


Shouldn’t that tell you something.It tells me that McCain "Doesn’t get it" and is out of touch with the middle & Lower classes! also voted against G.I.Bill for Troops & Veterans! What a "Patriot".

Obama/Biden 2008!
Ebony & Ivory Presidency!
slyham166 | Sep 07, 2008


At least he voted on something instead of just voting "present." You gotta love all these little teenage girls who think they understand how the economy works…how sad.
saq428 | Sep 07, 2008


A person making minimum wage has no business trying to buy a home!

The vast majority of people working for minimuum wage are teenagers. If you are a grown man with a family working at minimum wage, you need to take inventory of your life & try to find out why you haven’t managed to pull yourself out of that hole!

Do you not understand that only a very small number of people work at minimum wage? And if it raised, then businesses will be forced to either hire fewer workers, or raise prices!

Smarty Kat | Sep 07, 2008


I’m fine with it. If you’re making minimum wage, you shouldn’t be buying a home. The people who cause the problems are the ones who think that owning their own home is a right, or sort of entitlement, when its not. The problem is that people making minimum wage have chosen not to try to advance their lives in any meaningful way. When the minimum wage gets raised for essentially an uneducated workforce, it penalizes those of us who decided to go out and work hard. I make well above minimum wage, but that gap has gotten closed to a degree over the years. I’ve essentially been penalized for getting an education and working hard. People making minimum wage have two choices- accept the squalor they have to live in and make the best of it, or get off their ass and take steps to make more money. Raising minimum wage cost people their jobs too. When you have a small business owner who can’t afford to pay increased wages to unskilled labor, they then have to lay off that unskilled labor. So you may want to make your extra 75 cents/hour, but that could cost your co-worker their job.
Brian B | Sep 07, 2008


Did you know that the minimum wage actually causes more damage to the middle class than it helps the "poor"?

That is because the minimum wage only affects two types of people: those who make less than the projected minimum wage and the Unions. Everyone else (the "working middle class") is at the mercy of their employers for a COLA (Cost of Living Adjustment), and on the rare occassion that a COLA is granted…it’s almost never high enough to off set the increased minimum wage.

For example, when the minimum wage was $5.25, I was making $9.90. A fairly respectable wage for a skilled worker. Since then, the minimum wage has increased to $7.25, an increase of $2. My wages are now only $10.56, an increase of $0.66 - and that was from TWO annual work merit increases, not a COLA. My job has yet to give me a COLA, despite a drastically increased cost of living in my area from the minimum wage increase. So I went from making $4.65 above minimum wage to making only $3.31 above minimum wage - an effective pay cut of $1.34/hour for someone who is still in the first tax bracket - a lower middle class working person.

Oh…and John McCain doesn’t own 7 homes. His wife, Cindy McCain, owns 7 homes and they have a prenuptual agreement. Which means if/when they divorce, he gets nothing she brought into the marriage or anything she bought - including those 7 homes SHE owns.
solaran_x | Sep 07, 2008


I like knowing that. To tell you the truth, I couldn’t agree more. By raising the minimum wage, the companies that only pay minimum wage will now have to raise their prices to make up for the loss. So as the wage goes up, so does the cost of living, and then your still stuck in the same boat you were before the increase.
tigerfan_1987 | Sep 07, 2008


Look at it from this perspective: Most people who are hard working and been in the work force for more than a few months make more than minimum wage. And if a person had worked their way up to $10 an hour at a job, then minimum wage was raised, they most likely would not get a raise from it. However, the prices of the things they buy would increase, making their $10 an hour actually a paycut.
Just for the record, almost immediately after the last minimum wage increase, the cost of a loaf of bread went up by 20 cents, a 20 oz soda, went up by 20 cents, and the costs of most of the value meals at McDonalds went up 30 cents or more. at least they did in the area where I live. So, any benefit gained by the people who were working for minimum wage almost instantly went away. At the same time, those of us who have worked our tails off to make it to a level a good bit over minimum wage, have had to lower our standards of living because we still have to pay more for the goods we use, but did not recieve the raise. This minimum wage increase basically helped decrease the value of the US dollar, which is a major factor in why everyone in the US is paying more for fuel.
So I am very proud of McCain for voting against the minimum wage increase that many times.
Raising minimum wage helps the minimum wage employee very little if any in the long run(possibly even hurts them when businesses start laying off), and hurts most of the "Middle Class".
Thank you John McCain for trying to help out Middle Class workers like myself!!!
Edit: actually, the last minimum wage increase was only a little over 1 decade ago, in 1997.
Slavery was wrong, thats why it was abolished around 140 years ago. It has nothing at all to do with todays people, not you, not me, not anyone that is alive. Bitch all you want about it, but you are owed nothing because of something that happened to people you have never met and most likely know nothing at all about. My grandparents were never slaves, yet they worked from well before daylight, and well after dark everyday but sunday, when they worked from right after church till well after dark, so don’t try to give slaves all the credit for building this country. Most of the white people during the times of slavery couldn’t afford slaves, or didn’t want them, so they worked for themselves, every bit as hard.

Inflation is and always will be a factor in any economy. Prices on almost items(technology being the most common exception). However I don’t ever recall a rise in the cost of most basic items as drastic as in the last year. Raising the mini wage was really bad timing in 2007. Noone really benefitted from it.
I’ll stress again, very few people who have worked hard for any length of time still make minimum wage, since even grocery stores, gas stations, and fast food restaurants give raises to people who work hard.
Mickey L | Sep 07, 2008


I feel nothing! No President will ever, ever, raise the minial wage to where it should be. Currently in California, it should be $15 per hr. tell me smarty pants, who is going to do that? A woman, a black, a jew, a old man, a young man? No one will, so your question has no real meaning.
it is mute, it is done, it serves no purpose.
leegulboyz | Sep 07, 2008


Maybe because letting the market dictate wages would drive up peoples’ incentive to get more education and contribute more to the economy, thus increasing the wages for everyone.

It’s not rocket science.
Patchass | Sep 07, 2008


Makes me feel that he is on the side of the poor by not denying them jobs. ALL scholarly studies done have concluded that minimum wages hurt the people they are supposed to help and are a bad economic idea.

Excuse for inflation? It is not as high as it would have been were minimum wages increased.
Caninelegion | Sep 07, 2008


My honest opinion is that raising the minimum wage, alone, does nothing for the majority of Americans making the median income. Generally, families whose heads of household make only the minimum wage automatically qualify for nearly every form of social service available (food stamps, welfare, section 8 housing, Medicaid, etc.) The ones being most affected by this downturn in the economy are those who make too much to qualify for govt assistance but not enough to pay for rising costs of basic necessities (and incur mounting debt in order to do so).

If Congress were truly bold, they’d mandate cost-of-living increases in order to keep pace with skyrocketing real inflation (which is twice the "official" rate). Unfortunately, nearly every member of Congress from both parties are in the pockets of Big Business and other corporate interests who have been the sole beneficiaries of "Bushonomics" and varying forms of corporate welfare so don’t expect any real benefit for the average American worker in the near future.

For the clueless who blame labor costs as the reason for high prices, look again. Under the Bush regime, corporations have lobbied successfully to lower occupational safety standards and relax restrictions in the marketplace. The minimum wage has not increased for the last 10 years prior to legislation passed by the "Democratically-controlled" Congress. Median income has actually taken a slight dive since the Clinton years. The primary factor driving the inflation rate to record levels is because of government’s heavy borrowing, leading to the devaluation of the American dollar. Some people STILL do not get it.
?Nu?

October 27, 2009

Can I Get Into These Business Schools?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — francisbyrd1978 @ 11:45 pm

Hi, I am a junior at a prestigious public high school in New York (blue ribbon award and all that), and I was wondering if I have a chance at these business schools. I am asking a lot so I really appreciate that you have taken your time to review this question. My top two choices are USC and UT so at the very least please let me know if I have a chance there.
-USC (Marshall)
-University of Texas (McCombs)
-Emory University (Goizeuta)
-University of Virginia (McIntire)
-University of California-Berkeley (Haas)
-University of North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler)
-NYU (Sterns)
-University of Michigan (Ross)
-Indiana University (Kelley)
-Georgetown University (McDonough)
-Cornell University
-Villanova University
-Boston College (Carrol)
-Carnegie Mellon (Tepper)
-University of Richmond (Robbins)
-Lehigh University
-University of Maryland (Smith)

Here are my credentials:
4.1 - 4.2 weighted GPA
2000-2100 SAT
SAT II for Math 2 (700 +), US History (650 +), Biology (maybe)
30 ACT

9 Honor Classes (Biology, Geometry, Chemistry, LA II (sophomore), Algebra 2, US History, Pre-Calculus, LA III (junior), LA IV (senior)

5 - 6 AP Classes (Biology, US History, Statistics - Junior year, Calculus and European History, Government (maybe)- Senior year)

Extras:
-President of FBLA chapter at my High School (a nationally-renowned business club, kind of like the MUN of business)

-Placed in the top three in the state for my FBLA competition and competed at Nationals two years in a row.

-Participated in the Fed Challenge club (hyper competitive economics club). Also received a generic recommendation from Ben Bernanke.

-200 hours of volunteering

-Interned at a Pharmaceutical Company (business side of it) and a Marketing Firm during every summer in High School.

-Took a business credit course over one summer and earned 3 college credits.

PS:
-Is USC really in a terrible and dangerous location?
-Is University of Richmond racist?

-I also would like to know how difficult it is to get into a 2 year business program?
-Do I need a certain GPA and does the program only accept like 100 kids or much more?

Thanks a lot.


hi, yes you can get into these colleges(most). Personally i would go for uc berkley or Uc San Diego. Do not go to Uc Richmond. I personally have herd bad stories about it. To get into buisness programs they look at your GPA and also extra classes or activities that you have taken in high school.

Jon W | May 02, 2009

Why the current hate-fest by feminists concerning Fathers ?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — francisbyrd1978 @ 6:10 pm

"Battered Mothers Custody Conference

Albany, N.Y. - Advocates say the significance of domestic violence is often overlooked by family courts, lawyers and court-related services. They’re hoping to change that this weekend with the sixth Battered Mothers Custody Conference.

It’s a chance for more than 30 legal experts, activists and advocates to talk about their concerns and solutions."

Why do feminists always promote women as being victims and men as being the opposite ?
Are women not abusers too ?

Why the blatant sexism and why have a conference that is only designed to show women as victims ?

http://www.batteredmotherscustodyconfere nce.org/presenters_2009.htm

Here are some comments on that hate-fest..

"Wendy(Wendy Murphy) is most recently and infamously known for her vicious attacks on the Duke athletes and calls to deny all men due process. She was the one who lost the Harvard where she was stating that men accused of violence or rape should have no defence or trial, just punished upon the allegation of any female.

You will find recently sanctioned attorney Barry Goldstein on the speakers list. Just this week Barry’s BAR license was put into a FIVE YEAR suspension for aiding, encouraging, and abetting false allegations against a father in a custody/child support dispute in the highly publicized Shockhome case. The Feminists had been using this case as a poster child for an abuser getting custody over a Battered Mother. Surprise, ALL of the allegations were false against the Daddy and the allegations were shown to be for personal gain for Ms. Shockhome and her Feminist Lawyer, Good Ole Sociopathic Barry G.

You will find a few speakers with excellent credentials presenting programs who have been duped into participating or who have continued to be in denial about what type of evil they are enabling by the credibility their presence provides this conference.

Then we have the leadership of NOW from Michigan and New York, Marcia Pappas.

Joan Zorza, Esq, the original co-author of VAWA is speaking as well.

And, these are just a few of the speakers.

You will not see Errin Prizzey, Wendy McElroy, Stephen Baskerville, Grayson Walker, or any number of the well credentialed Activists, Researchers, and Authors who have any other view than the Feminist sanctioned rabid male hate presented at this conference in a sometimes ohh soo patronizing manner. They will not even receive an invite to attend."

Why do feminists hate men so much ?
So you live in denial and refuse to answer the question. Typical feminist response..
"ClareF
How did that make you think they are man haters? You do not make sense.
I am a feminist and I do not hate men."

Yet you support a doctrine that does..

Have you not worked that out yet ?


While laws are supposed to be gender-neutral, law execution is far away from being fair, it’s totally biased.

Yes, feminists are against fathers rights - they even question if fathers rights should exist at all.

The only reason, why they accept the existence of a father is out of his obligation to pay child-support.

Yohan | Jan 12, 2009


Because they want to be us thats why.
Elvis O | Jan 12, 2009


MRA rant with the same old theme and links to websites.

It’s not denial….you’re saying that feminists hate men. You’ve made a statement that naturally puts my back up. We know women abuse as well. How does that make us hate men?
Nikki | Jan 12, 2009


Great rebuttal from the feminists here. Simple fact, feminists hate fathers.
Mr VanHuizen | Jan 12, 2009


You do not make a sound argument. The people behind the conference just want to point out that children should not be put into the custody of a man who beats women. How did that make you think they are man haters? You do not make sense.
I am a feminist and I do not hate men. I deplore the fact that fathers are not present in many homes today. People say it is bad for the sons to grow up fatherless but it is not good for little girls either. I will always be thankful for my dad and brother.
Christian J you sound like a bitter man
Take up a hobby and stop obsessing.
Clara F | Jan 12, 2009


Um, focusing on help concerning battered mothers doesn’t mean that you hate fathers, no more than fathers rights groups (with respect to custody) must hate mothers…mothers, after all, can have trouble getting custody too in some instances.
Izzi | Jan 12, 2009


I think it is difficult for a feminist or an average women to NOT take this question personally. There are a lot of women who are grateful to feminists in the past for things that made their lives better like gaining the same wage for same job back in the 70’s.

What I personally think is going on here is this:

Females through feminism didn’t just move into men’s spaces in the workforce. They created jobs in the community.

These jobs have been held by women and were and are for women so the theories, seminars and discussions with judges, lawyers, police officers and the like are all about, "what is in the best interest for women".

Now adays, school libraries have women’s literature, schools teach about women’s issues, the media is held accountable by national and global groups if they say something negative about women, politicians are feminists and so on. Feminism has become part of society in every area. In fact, to make government policy these days you have to make submissions to the gender equality commission under human rights proving that women will not be negatively affected.

The hate towards men is not necessarily IMO from all feminists or all women but part of the way the system is structured to perform.

There is no department to consider how men will be affected. There is no consultation from men. There is no consideration for men. With this bias in the system, fathers come out second best. And when they speak out, feminists or women working in these areas take offense for the simple fact that feminism is still quite new compared to the history of mankind. I don;t think women are aware of how much power they have today.

It is the system itself that is biased. It certainly does need to change.
easygoing | Jan 12, 2009


If you look, you will see that the conference is not run by feminists - it is a concern brought up by advocates, lawyers and the courts.
Domestic violence exists, unfortunately. Why do you want to deny it? In this particular instance the conference is about custody - so you must be able to understand the fears of the mothers concerned in these cases. Why would you want to diminish their fears if they are genuine and real?
I know that there are violent women - every one does. We are not fools - we are all of the same species, and yes, there is violence in all of us. Hopefully it is controlled.
But would you want your child to see a violent father? Or mother? If there is evidence of violence in a family situation, it should be addressed.
By the way - I didn’t see it referring specifically to violence as performed by fathers.
Yohan: you are so wrong. Every right thinking mother wants her child to have a relationship with his/her father. I wanted my children’s father to be a role model, a parent, a friend. I wanted them to be able to go to him when they were in trouble, and I wanted him to lead them. It didn’t happen.
Not because I didn’t want it, but because he didn’t want to be bothered.
As for child support: kids can’t live on air.
Emily Hobhouse | Jan 12, 2009


Mindshock - even if a man physically abuses a woman it doesn’t neccessarily mean he’s going to be a bad father!
It doesn’t follow that because he abuses the mother he should be denied a relationship with his own child. A man should have the right to a relationship with his child no matter how bad his relationship is with the mother.
Think about this….if a woman abuses her husband physically or psychologically do the courts deny her access to her child?!
Women need to get their heads around the idea that a father can have a relationship with his child which is NOT mediated by the child’s mother. I know it’s going to be difficult for women but until they achieve this shift in attitude and stop playing gatekeeper men will never get equal parenting rights.
I’m not standing up for violent men but I’m making a point of principle on a fathers right to an independent unmediated relationship with his own children.
keypointist | Jan 12, 2009


There is bad behaviour on both sides; however fathers are being bullied every bit as bad as physical bullying. A father often loses access to his children on the word of the female only ( see the link)

Would every child not love to have a dad like one who would climb up Big Ben to show how much he cares?
mike ingham UK | Jan 12, 2009


Dudley Moore once said what I think is true : "Men and women do not naturally live together"
Londonman | Jan 12, 2009


You sir are defending abusers and attacking the political movement that tries to protect and help their victims.

Have you no shame? Excuse me for assuming that your anti-feminist rants have no logic and blindly favor your own sex–even when they are abusers–over all women. Which makes you a misogynist and the excuser of heinous crimes.
Jenn | Jan 12, 2009


Ok, it’s clear some are man-haters who use the word ‘feminist’ to make people think it’s not that bad to do what they do and say what they say, right?

Sorta like the death row dumbasses who say they’ve found The Lord so someone will possibly have a little mercy?

People will use manipulation tactics if they’re so inclined. Why take it too seriously when it’s some nimrod claiming to be a feminist? =o/

Judging by the excerpt, I didn’t think I’d care to read the article. Sounds like BS and has nothing to do with feminism to me, or women even. Sounds like a group of numbnuts. There’s enough idiocracy in life we must pay attention to, so I avoid anything avoidable =o)

If they’re supporting false allegations and opting to just throw people in jail without fair trials, obviously most would agree that’s ridiculous…I’d hope!
amandamaria1432 | Jan 12, 2009

October 26, 2009

How much MM fondant is used for a cake?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — francisbyrd1978 @ 8:22 pm

Hi. I’m making my first cake using MM fondant. The fondant is already made and sitting in the fridge. However, my question is when I go to roll it out, do I use the whole thing for one cake? Or do I use half of the fondant per cake? I’m making 3, 8-inch cakes.
I followed a receipe that used 1 package of MM’s, and a 2lb bag of conf. sugar.


If you’re covering three different 8" cakes you may need another batch. I use that recipe and I usually can cover one 8" cake with half a batch. When you roll it out, you’ll end up with some that you trim off of the cake. As long as it doesn’t have buttercream on it, you can reuse that part.

Judi | Aug 03, 2009


depends on how much fondant you made. make sure you roll it out 1/8"…can’t be thicker/thinner than that.
r3c0ver | Aug 03, 2009

October 24, 2009

Make: Online : PopTech reimagines America

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — francisbyrd1978 @ 8:39 pm

In Camden Maine this week, the annual PopTech conference has taken over the town’s beautifully-restored 18th century opera house where an “A-list” of speakers contemplates the “re-invention” of America .

Just down the block, on Elm St., in a converted auto garage, two master makers are demonstrating how to take everyday objects, found in the techno-trash or commonly sourced on eBay, and re-invent them as high-tech gadgets with new purpose. It’s a mini-Maker Faire amidst the dazzling fall foliage. All day long, a steady stream of PopTech attendees wander into the garage. In the first bay, they meet Mike Gould and learn how he embeds red, green, and blue lasers into lunchboxes and slide projectors. In the next bay, Zach DeBord and his wife Kim are fashioning buzzing, twittering toys, soldered together from junked calculators, spare motors, wires, and postage stamp-sized solar cells.

Just down Route 1, in nearby Rockland, a lucky group of PopTechies got a chance to pull a spoke-shave at The Apprenticeshop , one of the oldest traditional boat-building schools in the country. Lance Lee, founder of the Apprenticeshop, was on-hand to explain the joys of working with wood, and his boat-building projects, including a smaller version of Tremolino, a 19th Century lateen-rigged Mediterranean workboat used by Joseph Conrad.

Back at PopTech, speakers expound on the impact of new technologies with a thought-provoking mix of optimism and fear. A disturbing contrast to “creative re-use” was photographer Chris Jordan’s photographs of seabirds brought down by plastic refuse. Jordan has just returned from Midway Island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. His photographs were literally “breathtaking.” The opera house audience was left speechless by his story of the destructive impact of these everyday materials. See “Midway: Message from the Gyre” on his site.

spiritually speaking, would you participate in a sweat lodge ceremony with other R&S'ers?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — francisbyrd1978 @ 6:38 pm

we can sweat out our differences instead of talk ourselves to death. whaddya say? :P
Jonas : i got you.


i would prefer an air-hockey tournament,

T | Jun 09, 2009


I’m a big proponent of unclogged pores.

They drink during those, right?
eric k | Jun 09, 2009


depends who is in my lodge.
Jeff S loves you | Jun 09, 2009


Where’s the lodge? I’m already sweating!
Bunz | Jun 09, 2009


It depends who I’m lodging with!
Dana the Great - MM's Queen | Jun 09, 2009


I can smell the B.O. already =]
cool kitty :) Supernatural fan

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress